Intel Core i5 660/661 CPU vs Core 2 Duo E8600 vs AMD Athlon X4 Review & Benchmarks

Intel Core i5 660/661 CPU Review and Specifications and Benchmarks vs core 2 Duo E8600 vs AMD Athlon X4 630/965

Here you can find benchmark test of six CPU from Intel and AMD from our friends in ixbtlabs.com , so lets begin with the features and specification of each CPU:



The new processors have a great potential for price cuts, especially as their process technology matures. The second important benefit is original architectural features which let dual-core processors feel all right among quad-core ones. The third benefit is that the new processors are actually new. Their rollout will allow the company to introduce proper order in its market share, because three similar chipsets is too much.

Athlon II X4

Features & Benefits
* Better Multi-Tasking Means Increased Office Productivity
* Setting the Pace in Digital Media
* Get more Power using less Power
* AMD PowerNow!™ Technology (Cool’n’Quiet™ Technology)
* AMD64 Technology
* Enhanced Virus Protection*
* AMD Athlon Processor Architecture Performance
* HyperTransport™ Technology
* Ready for the 64-bit future
* Purchase with Confidence

 

 Intel core 2

Core 2 is a brand encompassing a range of Intel's consumer 64-bit x86-64 single-, dual-, and quad-core CPUs based on the Intel Core microarchitecture. The single- and dual-core models are single-die, whereas the quad-core models comprise two dies, each containing two cores, packaged in a multi-chip module.The introduction of Core 2 relegated the Pentium brand to the mid-range market, and reunified laptop and desktop CPU lines, which previously had been divided into the Pentium 4, Pentium D, and Pentium M brands.

The Core microarchitecture returned to lower clock rates and improved the usage of both available clock cycles and power when compared with the preceding NetBurst microarchitecture of the Pentium 4/D-branded CPUs. The Core microarchitecture provides more efficient decoding stages, execution units, caches, and buses, reducing the power consumption of Core 2-branded CPUs while increasing their processing capacity. Intel's CPUs have varied wildly in power consumption according to clock rate, architecture, and semiconductor process, shown in the CPU power dissipation tables.

Intel Core i5

On September 8, 2009, Intel released the first Core i5 processor: The Core i5 750,[1]  which is a 2.66 GHz quad-core Lynnfield processor with Hyper-threading disabled. Lynnfield Core i5 processors have an 8 MB L3 cache, a DMI bus running at 2.5 GT/s and support for dual-channel DDR3-800/1066/1333 memory. The same processors with different sets of features (Hyper-Threading and other clock frequencies) enabled are sold as Core i7-8xx and Xeon 3400-series processors, which should not be confused with high-end Core i7-9xx and Xeon 3500-series processors based on Bloomfield.

The Core i5-5xx mobile processors are named Arrandale and based on the 32 nm Westmere shrink of the Nehalem microarchitecture. Arrandale processors have integrated graphics capability but only two processor cores. They were released in January 2010, together with Core i7-6xx and Core i3-3xx processors based on the same chip. The L3 cache in Core i5-5xx processors is reduced to 3 MB, while the Core i5-6xx will use the full cache and the Core i3-3xx will have no support for Turbo Boost[2]. Clarkdale, the desktop version of Arrandale, is sold as Core i5-6xx, along with related Core i3 and Pentium brands. It has Hyper-Threading enabled and the full 4 MB L3 cache.

The Clarkdale CPUs : 

All of the three new series -- Core i5-600, Core i3-500 and Pentium -- are based on the same chip, the further development of the Nehalem. As ixbtlabs.com have already said, one of the key advantages of the new architecture is its "modular" nature that provides excellent scalability in terms of the number of cores, both upward (from the initial 4 to 6 and 8 in prospective LGA1366 models) and downward. This is a considerable difference from the Core 2 architecture which is strictly dual-core. (Well, there are quad-core and hexa-core processors of that design too, but their cores are connected mechanically, which complicates data exchange between cores and results in other issues.) So, as a CPU, Clarkdale is the example of the downward scalability: it has two cores instead of four, but each is completely identical to those found in Bloomfield and Lynnfield. Against all expectations, Clarkdale even has the same L1 and L2 caches: 64KB and 256KB, respectively. The L3 cache is halved down to 4MB. Since cache occupies a large part of a CPU these days, all these changes are bound to reduce processor cost price. Smaller is cheaper even within the same process technology. However, the latter has changed from 45nm to 32nm. All of these efforts can reduce the cost price by a factor of three. In other words, while Lynnfield can be in processors for $200 and more, Clarkdale can be featured in solutions sold below $100. And it does just that in the form of the new Pentium."

CPUs Specifications :

CPU	Athlon II X4 630	Phenom II X4 965	Core 2 Duo E8600	Core 2 Quad Q9505	Core i5-661	Core i5-750
Core	Propus	Deneb	Wolfdale	Yorkfield	Clarkdale	Lynnfield
Process technology, nm	45	45	45	45	32/45	45
Core clock (std/max), GHz	2.8	3.4	3.33	2.83	3.33/3.6	2.66/3.2
Initial multiplier	14	17	10	8.5	25	20
Turbo Boost	-	-	-	-	2-1	4-4-1-1
Cores/threads	4/4	4/4	2/2	4/4	2/4	4/4
L1 cache, I/D, KB	64/64	64/64	32/32	32/32	32/32	32/32
L2 cache, KB	4 x 512	4 x 512	6144	2 x 3072	2 x 256	4 x 256
L3 cache, KB	-	6144	-	-	4096	8192
UnCore clock rate, GHz	-	2.0	-	-	2.13	2.13
RAM	2 x DDR3-1333	2 x DDR3-1333	-	-	2 x DDR3-1333	2 x DDR3-1333
QPI/FSB/HT	2000 MHz	2000 MHz	1333 MHz	1333 MHz	4.8 GT/s	4.8 GT/s
Socket	AM3	AM3	LGA775	LGA775	LGA1156	LGA1156
TDP, W	95	125/140	65	95	87	95

Benchmarks Test Intel Core i5 660/661 vs core 2 Duo E8600 vs AMD Athlon X4 630/965

by ixbtlabs.com

3D games and video encoding Benchmark Test :

ixbtlabs.com

pconline.com overall Benchmark Test:

Read More

Intel Core i3 530 VS AMD Phenom II X3 720 Benchmark review

Intel Core i3 VS AMD Phenom II X3 VS Intel Core i3 2.8ghz Benchmark review

Three core counter a two core or lets call it four cores using HT technology, on this "All in one Review" I want to share with you some of the best tests comparing the new generation Intel Core i3 530 which use two physical cores four cores using HT technology and the older AMD Phenom II X3 720 which use only two physical cores, so lets begin with the features and specifications of each CPU :

Intel Core i3 530

Intel Core i3 530 features :

With intelligent performance that accelerates in response to demanding tasks, such as playing games and editing photos, the new Intel® Core™ i5 processor moves faster when you do.

CPU-Z specifications:

Intel Core i3 530 Product information:

• 2.66 GHz and up to 3.20 GHz with Intel® Turbo Boost Technology
• 4 processing threads
• 8 MB of Intel® Smart Cache
• 2 channels of DDR3 1333 MHz memory

AMD Phenom II X3 720

AMD Phenom II X3 720 features :

Like the superheroes of old, the AMD Phenom II streaks out of the night to lay waste to your enemies with three 2.8GHz cores having L1 and L2 caches for each core and 6MB of L3 cache to be shared to handle really heavy loads or large data sets.

Memory transfers get faster than ever. HyperTransport Generation 3.0 mode allows up to 16.0GB/s of bandwidth. Up to 17.1GB/s memory bandwidth for DDR2 and up to 21GB/s memory bandwidth for DDR3 memory controller delivers an amazing 37GB/s of processor-to-system bandwidth. This unprecedented bandwidth is needed to feed the data hungry AMD64 with Direct Connect Architecture cores.

Phenom II X3 Specifications:

Brand	AMD
Series	Phenom II X3
Model	HDZ720WFGIBOX
CPU Socket Type	Socket AM3
Tech Spec
Multi-Core	Triple-Core
Name	Phenom II X3 720
Operating Frequency	2.8GHz
Hyper Transports	4000MHz
L1 Cache	128KB+128KB
L2 Cache	3 x 512KB
L3 Cache	6MB
Manufacturing Tech	45 nm SOI
64 bit Support	Yes
Thermal Design Power	95W
Cooling Device	Heatsink and Fan included

CPU-Z Specifications snapshot:

Benchmark Tests

Crysis test result:

full review

Sysmark 2007 test:

full review

X264 HD Benchmark test:

full review

Test ended here, according to the test results, the processor subsystem, memory subsystem, processor computing, video encoding, 3D rendering, the old Phenom II X3 720 take the lead over the intel Intel Core i3 530, even it pass the the Core i5 650 Intel core first generation. 

Moving to the gaming, the situation becomes very clear, Phenom II X3 720 has obvious advantage.

Read More

OCZ Vertex 2 SSD Pro Sandforce VS Intel X25 SSD vs Kingston SSD Benchmark Test

OCZ Vertex 2 SSD Pro Sandforce VS  Intel X25 SSD vs Kingston SSD Benchmark Test , at  andtech website , just checkout :

"it’s the first drive I’ve seen that’s actually better than Intel’s X25-M G2.

The cost of the Vertex 2 Pro is going to be high. Higher than Intel’s X25-M and any other consumer level SSD on the market today. OCZ is targeting it at the very high end 

PC Mark Vantage Overall Performance Test src:anandtech.com

Read More